In the case of “Kivi v. Kivi,” the Appeals Court of Massachusetts reviewed a divorce judgment and a complaint for civil contempt. The court affirmed the judgment of divorce nisi and the judgment on the complaint for civil contempt. The decision was issued as a summary decision under M.A.C. Rule 23.0, which means it is primarily directed to the parties involved and may not fully address all the facts or the panel’s rationale. Such decisions are not circulated to the entire court and represent only the views of the panel that decided the case. They can be cited for persuasive value but are not binding precedent.