In the case of “Lascom v. Lascom,” the Appeals Court of Massachusetts reviewed an amended judgment of modification dated December 7, 2022, which was affirmed. The case involved Victoria Elizabeth Lascom and Matthew William Lascom. The decision was issued as a summary decision under M.A.C. Rule 23.0, which means it is primarily directed to the parties involved and may not fully address all the facts or the panel’s rationale. Such decisions are not circulated to the entire court and represent only the views of the panel that decided the case. While these decisions can be cited for their persuasive value, they are not considered binding precedent. The judgment was affirmed by Judges Ditkoff, Singh, and Hodgens.